0 800 335 278
PPC
About the project
An online store in the fashion niche with a large product range and constantly changing collections. Sales directly depend on paid traffic, so Google Ads is used not as an auxiliary channel, but as the foundation for controlled growth.
Objective
The objective was not simply to “increase traffic.” It was both simpler and more complex: to grow without breaking the project’s economics.
Specifically:
- scale order volume
- maintain profitability
- preserve advertising manageability during growth
- avoid a situation where metrics grow but the business does not
What We Did
Challenges
Fashion is one of those niches where advertising quickly punishes mistakes.
During the process, it became clear that:
- not all products are equally useful for scaling
- part of the product range generates turnover but hurts ROAS
- Performance Max without constraints pulls budget toward weak areas
- brute-force scaling quickly leads to performance dips
The main risk was losing control during the growth phase.
Our Approach
We did not try to “beat the algorithm.” Instead, we set the right boundaries for it.
Key approach:
- advertising is built around business logic, not campaign types
- only product groups with consistently strong ROAS are scaled
- weak areas are constrained rather than “fixed with more budget”
- the focus is on transaction value, not transaction volume
Execution
During the process, we:
- segmented Performance Max by product range logic
- separated priority and high-margin groups into dedicated campaigns
- limited the influence of low-performing products
- regularly reallocated budgets across campaigns
- scaled only the combinations that consistently performed
Advertising stopped being a “black box” and became a manageable tool.
Results
Summary of results:
- the system achieved a stable ROAS of approximately 3.7
- traffic and conversion volume grew without sharp dips
- Performance Max became the primary results driver
- scaling was predictable and stress-free for the business
Important: the result was achieved not through aggressive growth, but through control and structure.
Analytics and confirmation of results
Conclusion
This case is not about “magic settings.” It is about the fact that in the fashion niche:
- scaling without structure = declining ROAS
- automation without control = loss of manageability
- consistent results are the outcome of systematic decisions
This approach is precisely what allows growth without losing efficiency.